AI Security & Guardrails

Secure every AI system — from predictive ML pipelines to generative AI en agentic workflows. One operating model for access, data protection, guardrails, threat detection, en governance.

AI GUARDRAIL FEED GOVERNED 12.4k prompts/min 7 blocked CRITICAL 14:02:18 Prompt injection attempt OWASP LLM01 · model-7b BLOCKED HIGH 14:01:42 PII detected in prompt 12 entities · pre-inference MASKED MEDIUM 13:58:09 Low-confidence response conf 0.34 · routed to human REVIEW 247 ms p95 8/8 GOVERNED EU RESIDENT REVIEWER human in loop NIST AI RMF ISO 42001 · EU AI Act

Core AI security capabilities

The foundational controls that secure how AI is accessed, prompted, fed with data, governed by policy, observed in use, en integrated with the rest of your stack — across predictive AI, generative AI, en agentic systems.

AI Model Access Control

Role-based access to AI systems, MFA en SSO integration, least-privilege enforcement, en API authentication with token management — only the right people en services reach your models, agents, en pipelines.

Prompt Security & Filtering

Prompt-injection detection (OWASP LLM01), malicious-prompt blocking, sensitive-keyword filtering, en jailbreak-attempt prevention at the input layer of every model en agent.

Data Protection & Privacy

PII detection en masking, data loss prevention for AI interactions, encryption in transit en at rest, secure retention policies, en regional data residency for training data, prompts, en outputs.

AI Guardrails & Policy Enforcement

Content moderation, toxicity en abuse prevention, response validation against company policies, restricted-topic enforcement, en hallucination-risk reduction on every output.

AI Usage Monitoring

Full audit logging, user activity tracking, end-to-end prompt en response monitoring, anomaly detection, en real-time security alerts give continuous visibility into every AI interaction.

Secure AI Integration

API security controls, third-party AI risk assessment, secure plugin governance, container en runtime protection, en integrated secrets management for every AI stack.

End-to-end AI security operations

From AI-specific threat detection through human-in-the-loop oversight to secure model lifecycle, every safeguard ties back to your SOC, your SIEM, en your compliance evidence chain — mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, en ISO/IEC 42001.

AI-Specific Threat Detection

Model poisoning, adversarial inputs, prompt manipulation, en abnormal model behaviour — detection logic tuned to AI attack surfaces, not retrofitted endpoint signatures.

Risk Scoring & Analytics

AI interaction risk scoring, user behaviour analytics, threat intelligence integration, en risk-based access policies that respond to real signals.

Compliance & Governance Mapping

Controls mapped to GDPR, DORA, ISO 27001, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, en HITRUST — with policy reporting en audit-ready evidence collection as a continuous activity.

SIEM & SOC Integration

Integration with leading SIEM platforms, dedicated AI security dashboards, automated incident ticketing, en SOC alert enrichment with AI-specific context.

Incident Response Support

AI misuse investigation, forensic logging across prompt, response, en model events, automated containment workflows, en threat-hunting support.

Continuous Validation

AI red teaming, vulnerability assessments, penetration testing for AI applications, en continuous posture monitoring of models, agents, en data flows.

Context-Aware Response Control

Industry-specific restrictions, department-level policies, geo-based limits, en risk-adaptive response filtering so AI behaviour matches the audience en the obligation.

Human Oversight Controls

Human-approval workflows, escalation paths for high-risk outputs, confidence-score visibility, en manual override capability where the stakes justify a human in the loop.

Secure Model Lifecycle

Model-version governance, secure deployment pipelines, drift detection, en integrity verification across training, fine-tuning, en inference.

Govern AI from day one

Reduced AI misuse risk. Faster, safer adoption. Improved regulatory compliance against NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 27001, GDPR, DORA, en HITRUST. Protection of intellectual property en reduced insider-threat exposure. Enterprise-niveau governance for every model — predictive, generative, or agentic.

Recente inzichten

Veilige en compliant systemen bouwen in gereguleerde Europese omgevingen
01 / 05
Blogs · Applicatiebeveiliging · Governance, risico en compliance · AI Security

Veilige en compliant systemen bouwen in gereguleerde Europese omgevingen

Voor gereguleerde Europese ondernemingen markeerde 2025 de overgang van voorbereiding naar handhaving. NIS2, DORA, CRA, GDPR en de EU AI Act gelden tegelijkertijd.

Lees het artikel
Engineering voor security en compliance by design
02 / 05
Blogs · Applicatiebeveiliging · Governance, risico en compliance

Engineering voor security en compliance by design

Beveiligingsincidenten beginnen zelden met een inbraak. Vaker beginnen ze met een ontwerpkeuze. Beveiliging moet vanaf het begin in systemen worden ingebouwd.

Lees het artikel
Cyberresilience versus cyberdefense: Wat leiders moeten prioriteren
03 / 05
Visie en analyse · SOC · Governance, risico en compliance

Cyberresilience versus cyberdefense: Wat leiders moeten prioriteren

Enterprise-cybersecurity kan niet langer worden vergeleken met hogere kasteelmuren bouwen. Moderne dreigingen tunnelen ondergronds en misbruiken kwetsbaarheden diep binnen het systeem.

Lees het artikel
Europa onder druk: Waarom cyberresilience een regelgevingsprioriteit is
04 / 05
Blogs · Governance, risico en compliance

Europa onder druk: Waarom cyberresilience een regelgevingsprioriteit is

Welkom in het tijdperk van cyberresilience. Cybersecurity, bekeken door de bril van spoedgeneeskunde. Je kunt niet elk ongeval voorkomen.

Lees het artikel
Managed SOC-diensten: Hoe ze traditionele SOC's vervangen
05 / 05
Blogs · SOC

Managed SOC-diensten: Hoe ze traditionele SOC's vervangen

Traditionele SOC's vertrouwden op alertverzameling, handmatige triage en reactieve respons. Hedendaagse security-operaties moeten omgaan met cloud-first-omgevingen.

Lees het artikel
Veilige en compliant systemen bouwen in gereguleerde Europese omgevingen
01 / 05
Blogs · Applicatiebeveiliging · Governance, risico en compliance · AI Security

Veilige en compliant systemen bouwen in gereguleerde Europese omgevingen

Voor gereguleerde Europese ondernemingen markeerde 2025 de overgang van voorbereiding naar handhaving. NIS2, DORA, CRA, GDPR en de EU AI Act gelden tegelijkertijd.

Lees het artikel
Engineering voor security en compliance by design
02 / 05
Blogs · Applicatiebeveiliging · Governance, risico en compliance

Engineering voor security en compliance by design

Beveiligingsincidenten beginnen zelden met een inbraak. Vaker beginnen ze met een ontwerpkeuze. Beveiliging moet vanaf het begin in systemen worden ingebouwd.

Lees het artikel
Cyberresilience versus cyberdefense: Wat leiders moeten prioriteren
03 / 05
Visie en analyse · SOC · Governance, risico en compliance

Cyberresilience versus cyberdefense: Wat leiders moeten prioriteren

Enterprise-cybersecurity kan niet langer worden vergeleken met hogere kasteelmuren bouwen. Moderne dreigingen tunnelen ondergronds en misbruiken kwetsbaarheden diep binnen het systeem.

Lees het artikel
Europa onder druk: Waarom cyberresilience een regelgevingsprioriteit is
04 / 05
Blogs · Governance, risico en compliance

Europa onder druk: Waarom cyberresilience een regelgevingsprioriteit is

Welkom in het tijdperk van cyberresilience. Cybersecurity, bekeken door de bril van spoedgeneeskunde. Je kunt niet elk ongeval voorkomen.

Lees het artikel
Managed SOC-diensten: Hoe ze traditionele SOC's vervangen
05 / 05
Blogs · SOC

Managed SOC-diensten: Hoe ze traditionele SOC's vervangen

Traditionele SOC's vertrouwden op alertverzameling, handmatige triage en reactieve respons. Hedendaagse security-operaties moeten omgaan met cloud-first-omgevingen.

Lees het artikel

Veelgestelde vragen

What does AI security cover, en why does it matter for the enterprise?
AI security protects every AI system in the enterprise — predictive ML pipelines, computer-vision en NLP models, generative AI en LLMs, en agentic AI that takes actions on its own. It covers the models themselves, the data that trains en feeds them, the prompts en queries that drive them, the outputs en actions they produce, en the integrations they touch. The threat surface is unfamiliar to classical app security: model poisoning, adversarial inputs, prompt injection (OWASP LLM01), jailbreaks, sensitive-data leakage through outputs, excessive agency in tool-using agents, en drift in deployed models. It matters because AI is moving into customer-facing, decision-making, en revenue-critical workflows faster than traditional controls were built for — a single ungoverned model can expose IP, leak regulated data, or amplify insider risk at machine speed.
What are AI guardrails, en how are they different from prompt filters?
Prompt filters block specific inputs — keywords, regex patterns, known jailbreak strings. Guardrails are a broader policy layer that controls both inputs en outputs in context: industry-specific restrictions, department-level rules, geo-based limits, content moderation, restricted-topic enforcement, response validation against company policy, hallucination-risk reduction, en human-approval escalation for high-risk outputs. Filters are a starting point; guardrails are the operating model that lets you deploy AI defensibly.
Which regulations en frameworks apply to enterprise AI systems?
Most programmes need to align with NIST AI RMF (the US AI risk framework, 2023), the EU AI Act (in force since 1 August 2024, with risk-tier obligations applying through 2027), ISO/IEC 42001 (the dedicated AI management system standard, 2023), ISO/IEC 27001 (information security), GDPR (personal data in prompts, training sets, en outputs), DORA where AI sits on the ICT third-party register of a financial entity, en HITRUST or HIPAA where health data is involved. Sector en state overlays add PCI DSS for cardholder data, the Colorado AI Act, NYC Local Law 144 for automated employment decisioning, en emerging national frameworks (UK ICO AI guidance, BSI AIC4 in Duitsland, CNIL AI Action Plan in Frankrijk, MeitY responsible-AI advisory in India).
How does G'Secure Labs operationalise AI security?
As a managed programme covering the full AI estate — classical ML, computer vision, NLP, generative AI, en agents. Access control, prompt en output guardrails, en data protection on every model; AI-specific threat detection (mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 en MITRE ATLAS) wired into your SIEM en 24×7 SOC; risk scoring en behavioural analytics for AI interactions; AI incident response with forensic logging en automated containment; continuous red-teaming, VAPT, en posture monitoring; human-in-the-loop oversight for high-risk outputs; en model-lifecycle governance from training through drift detection. Compliance evidence is collected continuously against NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, ISO 27001, GDPR, DORA, en HITRUST so audits en board reporting are evidence-led rather than ad-hoc.

Neem contact op

Tell us where you are in your AI journey — we'll help you secure it before it scales.

Hoofdkantoor · Zweden
Isafjordsgatan 30A, 16440 Kista,
Stockholm, Zweden
Telefoon: +46 733 690899
consult@gsecurelabs.com